Ability to use statement to rebut Prosecution evidence

United Nations | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal TribunalsUN IRMCT

Introduction

The Case Law Database (“CLD”) is a gateway to the jurisprudence of the ICTR, ICTY, and IRMCT Appeals Chambers.

It provides direct access to extracts of key judgements and decisions rendered by the ICTR, ICTY, and IRMCT Appeals Chambers since their inception, as well as to full-text versions of the corresponding appeal judgements and decisions.

Users can conduct quick searches by notions, cases names, titles of filings, date (in year-month-day format), statutes, rules, and other instruments through the “Basic Search” page. In addition, refined searches in all fields of the database can be conducted through the “Advanced Search” feature.

Please note that the CLD does not include confidential decisions and restatements of established case law and does not necessarily contain all notable rulings by the Appeals Chambers of the ICTR, the ICTY, and the IRMCT. For exact numbering of footnotes, refer to full documents.

The CLD is a living tool and its content is being regularly updated. Please help us improve the service by using our feedback form.

Help

Browse the list of legal notion titles using the A-Z index. Click on the notion to show the page containing relevant case law extracts.

Submit Feedback

Please help us improve the service.

You can send ideas to
marshague at un dot org

Thank you very much for your help.

Notion(s)	Filing	Case
Evidence of an accused \| Statement of an accused (ICTY Rule 84bis) \| Ability to use statement to rebut Prosecution evidence	Decision on Accused's Statement - 20.04.2009	PRLIĆ et al. (IT-04-74-AR73.15)
23. While the Appeals Chamber considers that a statement made pursuant to Rule 84 bis may touch upon any aspect of the case against the accused, including expert reports, the scope and length of such statements remain under the control of the Trial Chamber. Download full document		ICTY Rule Rule 84 bis