Public redacted version
Notion(s) | Filing | Case |
---|---|---|
Decision on Reconsideration and Clarification - 12.07.2013 |
NYIRAMASUHUKO et al. (Butare) (ICTR-98-42-A) |
|
5. The Appeals Chamber notes that, while Nteziryayo filed the public redacted version of his Corrected Amended Appeal Brief with two annexes containing the index of authorities and source materials, he failed to append the relevant annexes to the confidential version of his Corrected Amended Appeal Brief. Nteziryayo had likewise failed to append the relevant annexes to his Amended Appeal Brief. The Appeals Chamber considers that a public redacted version of a confidential filing cannot contain more source materials than the original confidential filing. […] |
||
Notion(s) | Filing | Case |
Decision on Redacted Versions of Decisions - 18.07.2016 |
KARADŽIĆ Radovan (MICT-13-55-A) |
|
Page 5: CONSIDERING […] that issuing public redacted versions of the Decisions will ensure the public nature of these proceedings to the extent possible while the interests of the parties on whose behalf the ex parte status was granted can be adequately protected by appropriate redactions; |