30. With respect to the document in Annex 6 to the Motion, which indeed appears to be a different translation of Exhibit P01310,[1] the Appeals Chamber recalls that when the original language version of an exhibit is already part of the trial record, “the English translation of the exhibit does not constitute ‘new’ or ‘additional’ evidence pursuant to Rule 115 of the Rules”.[2] Moreover, challenges concerning the Trial Chamber’s interpretation of a translated document in evidence are matters for the consideration of the merits of the appeal.[3] Without prejudice to Popović’s respective arguments in his Appeal Brief, the Appeals Chamber therefore declines to consider the document in Annex 6 to the Motion for the purposes of admission of additional evidence on appeal.