Prior statement

United Nations | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal TribunalsUN IRMCT

Introduction

The Case Law Database (“CLD”) is a gateway to the jurisprudence of the ICTR, ICTY, and IRMCT Appeals Chambers.

It provides direct access to extracts of key judgements and decisions rendered by the ICTR, ICTY, and IRMCT Appeals Chambers since their inception, as well as to full-text versions of the corresponding appeal judgements and decisions.

Users can conduct quick searches by notions, cases names, titles of filings, date (in year-month-day format), statutes, rules, and other instruments through the “Basic Search” page. In addition, refined searches in all fields of the database can be conducted through the “Advanced Search” feature.

Please note that the CLD does not include confidential decisions and restatements of established case law and does not necessarily contain all notable rulings by the Appeals Chambers of the ICTR, the ICTY, and the IRMCT. For exact numbering of footnotes, refer to full documents.

The CLD is a living tool and its content is being regularly updated. Please help us improve the service by using our feedback form.

Help

Browse the list of legal notion titles using the A-Z index. Click on the notion to show the page containing relevant case law extracts.

Submit Feedback

Please help us improve the service.

You can send ideas to
marshague at un dot org

Thank you very much for your help.

Notion(s)	Filing	Case
Witnesses \| Refreshing witness memory \| Prior statement	Decision on Refreshing Witness Memory - 02.04.2004	HADŽIHASANOVIĆ & KUBURA (IT-01-47-AR73.2)
CONSIDERING that the Appeals Chamber has already stated that a prior statement may be used to refresh the memory of a witness under cross-examination;[1] and that the same conclusion should apply to the question of refreshing a witness’s memory during examination-in-chief; show footnotes [1] Prosecutor v. Simić et al., “Decision on Prosecution Interlocutory Appeals on the Use of Statements not Admitted into Evidence Pursuant to Rule 92bis as a Basis to Challenge Credibility and to Refresh Memory”, 23 May 2003, paras. 18, 20. Download full document