220. The Appeals Chamber finds the fact that the FYROM granted amnesty to others involved in the FYROM-NLA conflict to be irrelevant in the present case, as the Tribunal is not bound by any act of the FYROM granting amnesty to those involved in the FYROM-NLA conflict under Article 24 of the Statute or Rule 101 of the Rules.[1] The Appeals Chamber also notes that the relevant legislature of the FYROM contains a provision that those who committed criminal acts falling within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal are excluded from the grant of amnesty.[2] Hence, Tarčulovski does not show any alleged error of the Trial Chamber in failing to consider whether such amnesty could have had an impact on his sentence.