Unequivocal guilty plea
| Notion(s) | Filing | Case |
|---|---|---|
| Appeal Judgement - 19.10.2000 |
KAMBANDA Jean (ICTR 97-23-A) |
|
|
84. The Appeals Chamber notes that, as articulated by Judges McDonald and Vohrah in the Erdemović case, “[w]hether a plea of guilty is equivocal must depend on a consideration, in limine, of the question whether the plea was accompanied or qualified by words describing facts which establish a defence in law.”[1] This Appeals Chamber agrees with this statement. [1] Erdemović, “Judgement, Joint Separate Opinion of Judge McDonald and Judge Vohrah”, para. 31. |
ICTR Rule Rule 62(B) ICTY Rule Rule 62 bis | |