Rule 70 material

Notion(s) Filing Case
Decision on Access (Perišić) - 27.04.2009 MILOŠEVIĆ Dragomir
(IT-98-29/1-A)

13. The Appeals Chamber notes that, under Rule 70(B) of the Rules, information “provided to the Prosecutor on a confidential basis and which has been used solely for the purpose of generating new evidence […] shall not be disclosed by the Prosecutor without the consent of the person or entity providing the initial information”. The same restriction may be applied to information in possession of the Defence under Rule 70(F) of the Rules. In respect of motions seeking access to confidential material in another case, the Appeals Chamber has previously ruled that material provided under Rule 70 of the Rules shall not be released to the accused in another case unless the provider consents to such disclosure.[1] Accordingly, the Appeals Chamber holds that any material that has been provided to the Prosecution under Rule 70(B) of the Rules, in addition to any material that may have been provided to Milošević under Rule 70(F) of the Rules, shall not be released to Perišić unless and before the providers give their consent.

[1] Galić Decision [Prosecutor v. Stanislav Galić, Case No. IT-98-29-A, Decision on Momčilo Perišić’s Motion Seeking Access to Confidential Material in the Galić Case, 16 February 2006], para. 12, referring to Prosecutor v. Mladen Naletilić, aka “Tuta” and Vinko Martinović, aka “Štela”, Case No. IT-98-34-A, Decision on “Slobodan Praljak’s Motion for Access to Confidential Testimony and Documents in Prosecutor v. Naletilić and Martinović” and “Jadranko Prlić’s Notice of Joinder to Slobodan Praljak’s Motion for Access”, 13 June 2005 (“Naletilić Decision”) p. 8.

Download full document
ICTR Rule Rule 70 ICTY Rule Rule 70
Notion(s) Filing Case
Appeal Judgement - 19.03.2019 KARADŽIĆ Radovan
(MICT-13-55-A)

262. The Appeals Chamber recalls that the purpose of Rule 70 of the ICTY Rules is to encourage States and other entities and persons to share sensitive information with parties and the ICTY by providing certain guarantees of confidentiality with respect to the information they offer.[1] Those providing information under Rule 70 of the ICTY Rules who show genuine interest in protecting the information in their possession may invoke this rule to ensure the protection of such information by requiring, inter alia, limitations on the scope of a witness’s testimony or on the dissemination of that witness’s testimony.[2] However, any such restrictions on the presentation of evidence at trial may only be allowed after the trial chamber has determined that the restrictions would not undermine the fairness of the trial.[3] In this respect, Rule 70(G) of the ICTY Rules provides that a trial chamber may exclude such evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the need to ensure a fair trial.[4]

263. […] Rule 70 of the ICTY Rules does not place a burden on those providing information under this rule to substantiate their concerns. Rather, it is for the trial chamber to weigh the probative value of the information received on a confidential basis against the need to ensure a fair trial. […]

[1] The Prosecutor v. Casimir Bizimungu et al., Case No. ICTR-99-50-AR73.6, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Relating to the Testimony of Former United States Ambassador Robert Flaten, signed on 16 July 2007, filed on 17 July 2007 (“Bizimungu et al. Decision of 17 July 2007”), para. 17; Prosecutor v. Milan Milutinović et al., Case No. IT-05-87-AR73.1, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Against Second Decision Precluding the Prosecution from Adding General Wesley Clark to its 65[ ]ter Witness List, 20 April 2007, para. 18; Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milošević, Case No. IT-02-54-AR108bis & AR73.3, Public Version of the Confidential Decision on the Interpretation and Application of Rule 70, signed on 23 October 2002, filed on 29 October 2002, para. 19. See also The Prosecutor v. Casimir Bizimungu et al., Case No. ICTR-99-50-AR73.6, Order Lifting the Confidentiality of the Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Relating to the Testimony of Former United States Ambassador to Rwanda Issued on 16 July 2007, 19 April 2010.

[2] See Rules 70(C) and (D) of the ICTY Rules. Cf. Bizimungu et al. Decision of 17 July 2007, para. 17.

[3] Bizimungu et al. Decision of 17 July 2007, para. 17. See also Articles 20(1), 21(2), and 22 of the ICTY Statute; Rule 89(D) of the ICTY Rules.

[4] See also Rule 89(D) of the ICTY Rules.

Download full document
ICTY Rule Rule 70